If you want to raise a public issue in India's highest court, a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is the way to go. A PIL lets anyone – an individual, a NGO, or a group – ask the Supreme Court to step in when a matter affects the public at large. You don't need to be a lawyer, but you do need a clear case and the right paperwork.
First, write a concise petition that tells the court what the problem is, who is affected, and why it matters to the public. Keep it factual and avoid emotional language. Attach any supporting documents – government orders, reports, or news clippings – that prove your point.
Next, file the petition at the Supreme Court Registry. You can do this in person or by registered mail. Pay the required fee, which is usually minimal for PILs. After filing, the court will assign a case number and may issue a notice to the government or other respondents.
While waiting for a response, make sure you have a reliable address on record. The court often sends summons or orders by post, and missing a deadline can stall your case.
Once the petition is accepted, the court may schedule a hearing. During the hearing, the judge will ask you to explain the issue and may request additional evidence. It's a good idea to be prepared with a short, clear summary and answers to possible questions.
If the court finds merit in the case, it can issue directions to the government, order an investigation, or even pass a judgment that changes policy. If the court dismisses the petition, you can still appeal the decision, but keep in mind that appeals require a stronger legal basis.
Throughout the process, stay in touch with any legal counsel you have. Even though you can file a PIL without a lawyer, professional advice can help you avoid procedural mistakes and present a stronger argument.
Remember, a successful PIL can bring real change – from improving health services to protecting the environment. By following these steps and staying focused on the public interest, you give the Supreme Court a clear reason to act.
The Supreme Court of India has dismissed a plea which sought for 100% matching of voter-verified paper audit trail (VVPAT) slips with electronic voting machines (EVMs) during the counting of votes. The plea stated that 100% matching would ensure the accuracy and integrity of the electoral process. However, the Supreme Court held that the existing process of matching VVPAT slips with EVMs is sufficient and there is no need to change it, as it would cause an unnecessary delay in the results.
READ